Monday, November 12, 2007

The Semantics of Politics

I just read an interesting article that has shown the Democratic presidential candidates are shying away from calling themselves “liberals.”
Hillary Rodham Clinton was asked this summer if she would describe herself as a “liberal.”

The Democratic front-runner shied away, saying the “word” — noticeably not using the word — has taken on a connotation that “describes big government.

“I prefer the word ‘progressive,’” she said. It has a “real American meaning.”

Then she expanded the term to “modern progressive,” and, finally, clarified that she was a “modern American progressive.”

Personally, I am very happy that the Democratic presidential candidates have decided that the word liberal doesn’t fit them. In fact, that word has developed a connotation with the average American voter in recent decades that has had the effect of completely reversing what the true word means. Maybe I can resume calling myself a liberal instead of a "small 'l' libertarian." It's a lot easier to type.

The Webster’s dictionary (4th edition paper version, I was offline when writing this) describes liberalism as, “the quality or state of being liberal; specifically a political philosophy advocating personal freedom for the individual.” However, the group that has been called liberal have actually been promoting governmental control of many social responsibilities, thereby limiting personal freedom for individuals. Typically, this would be called socialism, except that term also carries many negative connotations with the average American voter, which explains why it isn’t being used.

In today’s politically correct world, the emphasis is placed more on the connotation of words than that of their actual meaning. Being liberal has changed from “advocating personal freedoms of individuals” to describing “big government.” A person isn’t “black” instead he or she is “African-American” even if he or she has never set foot in an African country in their entire life.

This is precisely why I despise political correctness so much. The PC policy doesn’t affect change, it hides the problem from the truth, therefore preventing honest debate that can bring about change.

2 comments:

Easter Durni said...

I blame Marxism for turning "liberal" into a toxic label. Marx said "it is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness." I mean, what positive things can you say about a guy whose ideology came close to rivaling cancer for killing people during the 20th century?

Compromise was totally understandable at a certain point, especially during the Cold War when it looked as though there was going to be a nuclear slugfest, and blurring the line made a lot of sense. Then the wall came down, the USSR collapsed, and other than Castro, what's left?

When it comes right down to it, liberalism stands for the rights of individuals to do as they will, and Marxism holds that individuals don't have free will, all their choices are determined by the society they live in.

Amusing that Hilary is jumping on the progressive bandwagon since nearly everyone I know that refers to themselves as progressive can't stand her except the ones that are only behind her because she's female.

I tried being a libertarian but I really think the state needs to bring out the iron fist of control when it comes to things like destruction of wildlife habitats and other non-renewable resources (I worked on a major ongoing lawsuit along those lines at my last firm). I was green for a while until the greens went red and started talking more about defeating capitalism than protecting the bunnies.

Oh and the Marx quote came from
http://www.amazon.com/Life-Bottom-Worldview-Makes-Underclass/dp/1566633826
(a book that made me want to hide in the house for a couple of days).

More political weirdness for you:
Che -- Jihad martyr
http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2007/10/post_504.html

Jesus died for your carbon footprint
http://www.frankfuredi.com/index.php/site/article/159/

Easter Durni said...

Blogger cut off the amazon link. The book is Life at the Bottom: The Worldview that Makes the Underclass by Theodore Dalrymple. He is a "red diaper baby" who was raised to be a Marxist, practiced medicine in the slums of London and in Africa, and that experience turned him into a very astute social critic.

And as far as Hilary, can't stand her. I'm hoping for my homey Obama but not too optimistic about his chances.